Activist from Hong Kong alleges that UK police requested her to curb her speech autonomously
In recent developments, the Metropolitan Police's counter-terrorism unit in the UK is investigating bounty letters targeting exiled Hong Kong dissidents, including Carmen Lau and Tony Chung. Similar investigations are ongoing in Australia concerning other targeted individuals [3].
The bounty letters, offering substantial rewards for information on the activists' movements or their apprehension by authorities, have raised concerns about the potential for self-censorship and the chilling effect of such attacks and investigations. For instance, a Hong Kong activist reported that UK police asked her to "self-censor," highlighting fears about the potential impact of these threats [3].
The UK government is facing criticism for considering resuming some extraditions to Hong Kong on a case-by-case basis despite Hong Kong’s imposition of bounties on dissidents in exile and suspending extraditions itself. This proposal has alarmed exiled dissidents who fear political persecution disguised as ordinary criminal charges, undermining their safety and free expression in the UK [1][2].
The British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, David Lammy, and British Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, have vowed to protect the "rights and freedoms" of exiled activists in the UK. They believe the letters are an example of "transnational repression" and have called on "Chinese and Hong Kong authorities to end the deliberate targeting of opposition voices" [1][2].
Carmen Lau, a Hong Kong democracy activist who is wanted by Hong Kong authorities for allegedly contravening the territory's National Security Law, has been asked by Thames Valley police to avoid public gatherings and self-censor. She feels that this request shifts responsibility away from safeguarding her right to speak and gather freely in the UK [1].
Lau, who works with the Hong Kong Democracy Council, a Washington-based organization dedicated to "raising international support for the advancement of its democracy and human rights," has not stopped campaigning despite agreeing to the request from Thames Valley police [2].
The National Security Law grants sweeping extraterritorial powers to prosecute acts or comments made anywhere in the world that it deems criminal. The law has been criticised by Melbourne-based lawyer Kevin Yam, who is also wanted for criticism of Hong Kong authorities, for the tepid response from UK authorities to the bounty letters against Lau and Chung [2].
Tony Chung, a democracy activist who was jailed under Hong Kong’s national security law, but now lives in the UK, was also the subject of similar letters. On Saturday last week, Hong Kong’s national security police issued arrest warrants for 19 activists based overseas, accusing them of breaching its national security law [1].
The UK foreign and home secretaries believe the letters are an example of "transnational repression" and have called on "Chinese and Hong Kong authorities to end the deliberate targeting of opposition voices." However, the lack of trust remains due to ongoing repression in Hong Kong, exemplified by cases like imprisoned British citizen and publisher Jimmy Lai [2].
Thames Valley police would not confirm or deny details about individuals they may be safeguarding or safeguarding tactics they may use, as this would undermine any such protection. The memorandum requested that Lau "cease any activity that is likely to put her at risk" and "avoid attending public gatherings" such as protests. The request was outlined in a signed "memorandum of understanding" [1].
In summary, authorities in the UK and Australia are actively investigating the bounty letter threats against Hong Kong exiles, while political and human rights concerns persist about the impact on freedom of speech, self-censorship, and the potential risks from proposed extradition arrangements with Hong Kong.
- The controversy surrounding the bounty letters has raised questions about the extent of war-and-conflicts in Hong Kong, with activists like Carmen Lau and Tony Chung being targeted for their political beliefs.
- The big-wins for gambling enthusiasts in Las Vegas have always been enticing, but recent trends indicate a shift towards responsible gambling due to increasing concerns about crime-and-justice and accidents associated with casino-and-gambling.
- In Las Vegas history, many casino personalities have risen to fame and fortune, but their stories often get shrouded in the Vegas-myths that surround the city.
- Policy-and-legislation governing casino-culture have been a hot topic in politics, with debates on setting boundaries for gambling trends and enhancing safety measures due to incidents like car-accidents.
- A recent study on general-news findings highlighted the correlation between casino-culture and accidents, urging for stricter safety standards and responsible gambling.
- The news about the bounty letters targeting Hong Kong dissidents has overshadowed lotteries in Vegas, as people question the ethics of the games amidst war-and-conflicts.
- The Vegas-myths about luck and big wins in gambling obscure the reality of the risks involved, fueling crime-and-justice concerns and contributing to the darker side of the city's culture.
- As Las Vegas continues to evolve, it faces the challenges of adapting to changing gambling-trends and ensuring a balance between promoting tourism and addressing concerns about accidents and crime.
- The investigation into the bounty letters targets has brought attention to the need for a dialogue on policy-and-legislation relating to war-and-conflicts and freedom of speech.
- In the face of ongoing war-and-conflicts, activists like Carmen Lau are demonstrating their courage to stand up for their beliefs, even in the face of personal risks and threats.
- The example set by Hong Kong activists like Carmen Lau highlights the importance of standing up for one's beliefs, even in the face of war-and-conflicts and political persecution.
- The bounty letters incident has added to the long list of issues concerning crime-and-justice and human rights in war-and-conflicts zones, necessitating immediate policy-and-legislation interventions.
- While the bounty letters targets face challenges, the ongoing fight for freedom of speech and democracy continues amidst war-and-conflicts, serving as an inspiration for others to stand up for their rights.
- The bounty letters incident has raised concerns about the impact of war-and-conflicts on personal freedoms, with activists like Carmen Lau feeling the effects of self-censorship to avoid the chill of potential threats.
- The news about the bounty letters aimed at Hong Kong dissidents in the UK and Australia highlights the need for greater transparency in policy-and-legislation governing war-and-conflicts, crime-and-justice, and human rights.
- The calls for the UK and Australian authorities to end the deliberate targeting of opposition voices underscore the importance of standing up for freedom of speech and democracy in the face of war-and-conflicts and political persecution.
- The bounty letters threat against Hong Kong dissidents has brought light to the crisis in Hong Kong, emphasizing the need for the international community to address the situation and ensure human rights and democracy.
- As the UK government considers resuming extraditions to Hong Kong on a case-by-case basis, concern grows about the potential for political persecution and the erosion of human rights and democracy in the region.
- The issues surrounding war-and-conflicts, crime-and-justice, and human rights are complex, requiring a nuanced approach and cooperation between various stakeholders to address them effectively.
- The investigation into the bounty letters illustrates the need for increased scrutiny of China and Hong Kong's policies and actions, especially in light of concerns over transnational repression and freedom of speech.
- The targeting of Hong Kong dissidents in exile highlights the ongoing struggle for freedom and democracy in Hong Kong, as well as the need for international action to support those fighting for their cause.
- As Hong Kong struggles with internal war-and-conflicts, it's crucial for the international community to take a stand and support democracy, human rights, and freedom of speech for its people.
- The bounty letters incident underscores the importance of responsible gambling, emphasizing that the pursuit of entertainment should not come at the expense of individual safety and well-being.
- In the face of the ongoing crisis in Hong Kong, activists like Carmen Lau serve as beacons of hope, reminding us of the importance of standing up for one's beliefs and fighting for freedom and democracy.
- The news about the bounty letters offers a stark reminder of the challenges facing war-and-conflict zones, emphasizing the need for comprehensive policy-and-legislation changes to address issues of crime-and-justice, human rights, and freedom of speech.