Skip to content

Apple's strong stance on privacy has been deemed as anti-competitive by the German regulatory body.

Apple's actions aimed at curbing tracking weren't solely user-focused, but also served to bolster its own commercial endeavors, according to German authorities.

apple's commitment to user privacy is perceived as hindering competition, according to a German...
apple's commitment to user privacy is perceived as hindering competition, according to a German regulatory body.

Apple's strong stance on privacy has been deemed as anti-competitive by the German regulatory body.

In a significant turn of events, Apple's App Tracking Transparency Framework (ATT), introduced last year as part of iOS 14, has found itself at the centre of a global antitrust investigation. The framework, designed to give users control over their data, has been met with both praise for privacy protection and criticism for alleged market manipulation.

The investigation, led by German competition watchdog Bundeskartellamt, is focused on Apple's App Store ecosystem, with concerns raised about the company setting its own rules. Critics, including some operators in the adtech space, have labelled ATT as a "blatant market grab."

Apple, however, maintains that ATT empowers users to choose whether apps can track them or share their information with data brokers. The framework requires third-party app developers to ask for permission to track users, and access to user data is shut off when users say no.

The aftermath of the update's rollout saw stocks for Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter, and Pinterest plummet, with Facebook claiming that the ATT update would cost it an estimated $10 billion in targeted ad sales. Snapchat's CEO, Evan Spiegel, attributed a less-than-stellar quarter to ATT.

On the other hand, iOS users have been opting out of tracking in record numbers, a trend that Apple claims aligns with its commitment to privacy. The tech giant asserts that it holds itself to a higher privacy standard than most companies.

Apple is not immune to the antitrust investigation, with concerns raised about its rules applying to third parties but not to Apple itself. Bundeskartellamt President, Andreas Mundt, has stated that a corporation like Apple should make pro-competitive rules.

The investigation is not limited to Germany. Similar probes over the same issue have been initiated by competition authorities in France, Britain, and Poland. The European Commission is also reportedly looking into Apple's app store policies.

In response to the investigation, Apple is continuing to engage constructively with the FCO to address questions and discuss how its approach promotes competition and choice. The company is also taking steps to attract advertisers away from other tech giants, with one analyst estimating that Apple's ad business, currently worth $2 billion, could grow 10-fold by 2025.

However, Apple's pleas about privacy protection might be falling on deaf ears due to concerns about precluding monopolies. This sentiment is echoed by Mundt, who stated that Apple should make pro-competitive rules.

As the investigation unfolds, it remains to be seen how Apple's App Tracking Transparency Framework will navigate the delicate balance between privacy protection and competition in the digital marketplace.

Read also: