Skip to content

Calcutta High Court provides aid to individual deprived of teaching position at Ramakrishna Mission College due to Facebook updates

Court Grants Respite to Man Denied Professor Position Due to Social Media Posts at Ramakrishna Mission College

High Court in Calcutta grants reprieve to individual overlooked for professorship at Ramakrishna...
High Court in Calcutta grants reprieve to individual overlooked for professorship at Ramakrishna Mission College due to Facebook posts

Calcutta High Court provides aid to individual deprived of teaching position at Ramakrishna Mission College due to Facebook updates

In a recent development, the Calcutta High Court has granted relief to Tamal Dasgupta, a scholar who was denied an appointment as an Assistant Professor of English. The case, known as Tamal Dasgupta v State of West Bengal and others, is presided over by Justice Aniruddha Roy.

The denial of appointment was due to certain social media posts made by Mr. Dasgupta. However, the article does not provide any new information about the specific content of these posts. What is known is that they were allegedly offensive to a particular religion and the Ramakrishna Mission and its monks.

The college in question is run by the Ramakrishna Mission, but the article does not provide any new information about the institution. The case has garnered significant attention, yet the outcome beyond the relief granted to Mr. Dasgupta remains unclear.

The Calcutta High Court case is not the first time such an incident has occurred. In recent years, there have been numerous instances where individuals have faced consequences for their online behaviour, particularly when it comes to expressing views that are perceived as offensive to certain religious groups.

As the case continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between freedom of speech and the potential consequences of exercising that right in a public forum. For now, the focus remains on Mr. Dasgupta and the relief granted to him, as he navigates the complexities of this controversial case.

Please note that this is a premium article and requires a subscription to access its full content. For more updates on this and other similar cases, please consider subscribing.

Read also: