Chancellor introduces controversial new aid, causing concern among critics

In the lead-up to the Autumn Budget, a significant focus has shifted towards proposals for tax hikes, particularly on the big banks. The IPPR (Institute for Public Policy Research) has suggested a levy on these banks to raise an estimated £22 billion, which could help bridge the budget deficit.

This isn't the first time such a proposal has been made. Some argue that banks should pay for the emergency rescue measures they benefited from, a viewpoint that traces back to the Bank of England's quantitative easing (QE) programme, during which the Bank bought up bonds from banks and credited them with reserves at Threadneedle Street.

Torsten Bell, the British political economist and director of the Resolution Foundation, has been promoted to support Rachel Reeves with her Budget. Known for his research on poverty and inequality, Bell has previously advocated for tax increases on higher earners and wealthier households to address inequality and fund social programs. However, specific recent detailed proposals were not found in the search results.

Bell's proposals, such as abolishing business and agricultural relief, have already been introduced by Reeves. Yet, concerns remain about the potential impact of further taxes on banks. Some fear that these could constrain what banks lend to customers, both private and business, potentially depressing investor confidence in private businesses and public markets.

Banks already pay a corporation tax surcharge and a bank levy. Yet, the ongoing debate continues to explore additional taxes, ranging from capital gains on first homes to charging National Insurance on rental income, and even a new wealth tax.

The political debate is not without controversy, with Bell's history of proposing controversial tax measures coming into play. These have included scrapping the Lifetime Isa, big hikes to council tax, CGT on primary homes at a flat rate of 28 per cent, abolishing business and agricultural property relief, slashing VAT threshold to £30,000, raising the basic rate of dividend tax from 8.75 per cent to 20 per cent, and more.

The latest proposal for a new windfall tax levy has caused shares in UK banks to fall by nearly £7 billion in value. This underscores the potential impact such proposals could have on the financial sector and the wider economy.

As the Autumn Budget approaches, the debate continues, with some advocating for new ideas to inspire the next generation of entrepreneurs, while others focus on increasing taxes to address the budget deficit. The practice of kite-flying within Whitehall, where extreme ideas are put out in the open to see which ones are rejected the most, leaving more palatable ones for consideration, is a common strategy.

It's important to note that while This is Money may earn a commission from affiliate links to investment products, our editorial team's choices are not influenced by this. Our focus remains on providing valuable, unbiased information to our readers.

In this turbulent economic climate, the Autumn Budget promises to be a significant event, shaping the financial landscape for years to come. Stay tuned for more updates as the Budget approaches.