Skip to content

Criminal acts of sexual violence labeled as violations of human dignity: examining the instances in Guatemala and Peru

Explores the importance of legal responses to sexual violence during armed conflicts, focusing on their physical and emotional implications.

Criminal acts of sexual violence as an affront to human dignity: the incidents in Guatemala and...
Criminal acts of sexual violence as an affront to human dignity: the incidents in Guatemala and Peru

Criminal acts of sexual violence labeled as violations of human dignity: examining the instances in Guatemala and Peru

In a groundbreaking analysis, a recent paper has shed light on the legal treatment of sexual violence in contexts of armed conflict, specifically focusing on case studies from Guatemala and Peru. The paper, available at doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2017.117.3.79, reviews international standards for legal protection against sexual violence and delves into the specifics of these case studies.

The analysis reveals that the national legal systems in both Guatemala and Peru have established a legal basis to punish sexual violence crimes within armed conflict contexts as crimes against humanity. This marks the first time such a legal basis has been established based on international humanitarian law.

Sexual violence is a significant issue in armed conflict contexts, with severe physical injuries and deep emotional trauma inflicted upon victims. Women, in particular, are often objectified in conflicts, with the implications of this objectification projected into social reference groups. This objectification reinforces the marginalization and victimization of women, reducing them to symbols of power struggles.

The widespread use of rape as a weapon of war has profound physical and emotional effects. Detailed information on the psychological impact of this objectification on survivors of sexual violence in conflict zones can be found in specialized research reports and organizations such as Women for Women International and UN human rights bodies focusing on violence against women and girls in armed conflicts.

The paper under review also studies the cases of Sepur Zarco in Guatemala and Manta and Vilca in Peru. These cases provide valuable insights into the legal treatment of sexual violence in armed conflict contexts, setting a precedent for future legal actions. The full text articles of this issue are available only in Spanish language.

In conclusion, this paper underscores the importance of addressing sexual violence in armed conflict contexts and the need for continued efforts to establish and enforce legal protections against such atrocities. The cases studied offer a promising start towards achieving justice for victims of sexual violence in conflict zones.

Read also: