Skip to content

Federal authorities confirm maintaining oversight departments, yet continue to push for job cuts

Lawsuit filed by progressive legal groups aims to halt Trump administration's dismantling of the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and related actions...

Federal authorities at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have confirmed they won't scrap...
Federal authorities at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have confirmed they won't scrap oversight agencies, but they're still pushing forward with planned job cuts.

Federal authorities confirm maintaining oversight departments, yet continue to push for job cuts

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is currently in the midst of implementing reductions in force (RIFs) in several key offices, including the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL), the Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman (CISOMB), and the Immigration Detention Ombudsman (IDO). These offices play crucial roles in investigating allegations of civil rights and civil liberties violations, assisting individuals with issues related to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and independently examining immigration detention to promote safe, humane conditions.

The decision to implement RIFs has been met with criticism, as it affects over 300 individuals. Stakeholders continue to question the ability of migrants and the public to report civil rights violations due to the ongoing reductions in force.

Bloomberg Government was the first to report the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle these offices. The offices have been accused of obstructing immigration enforcement by adding bureaucratic hurdles and undermining the department's mission.

In response, a coalition of groups filed a lawsuit to block the offices' closures, which they attribute to a federal judge's instruction during a May 23 hearing. The lawsuit, filed by Public Citizen, argues that DHS must allow these offices to perform their statutorily required functions, including protecting the civil rights of vulnerable individuals.

The Trump administration's efforts to implement mass deportations of undocumented immigrants have led to allegations of due process violations. On May 21, a federal judge stated that DHS contravened a court order by not giving migrants enough notice to appeal before attempting to deport them to South Sudan.

Despite the ongoing controversy, the DHS has not made any statements about bringing back affected employees in these offices. Notices on the web pages of these offices state that they continue to exist and will perform their statutorily required functions.

Karla Gilbride, an attorney with Public Citizen, stated that the legal battle to prevent the offices' closures is not over. She emphasized that DHS must allow these offices to perform their statutorily required functions, including protecting the civil rights of vulnerable individuals.

The DHS has maintained that it remains committed to civil rights protections but is streamlining oversight to remove roadblocks to enforcement. However, the controversy surrounding the closure of these offices continues, raising concerns among stakeholders about the ability of migrants and the public to report civil rights violations.

Read also: