Skip to content

Government Imposes Self-Exclusion List for Problem Gamblers in Australia

Online betting curbs are instituted by the Australian administration: A registry enables compulsive gamblers to bar themselves from both digital and brick-and-mortar gambling activities.

Government initiates a self-exclusion registry for problematic gamblers in Australia
Government initiates a self-exclusion registry for problematic gamblers in Australia

Government Imposes Self-Exclusion List for Problem Gamblers in Australia

In an effort to combat problem gambling, self-exclusion registers have become a crucial tool in many countries. Three notable examples are BetStop in Australia, GAMSTOP in the UK, and OASIS in Germany.

BetStop, launched in August 2023, is Australia's national self-exclusion register. Operated by IXUP Limited and managed by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), it enables individuals to block access to all locally licensed online and phone gambling platforms. With over 30,000 users, it has faced criticism for loopholes, such as allowing evasion by using alternate IDs and incomplete coverage of all gambling forms.

GAMSTOP, introduced in 2018, is the UK's national online self-exclusion system. Mandatory for UK-licensed gambling operators, it allows users to block access to online gambling operators licensed in Great Britain. With more than 300,000 registrations, it faces similar limitations, such as not covering offline gambling or unlicensed operators. However, it is considered effective in reducing gambling among problem gamblers.

Details about OASIS in Germany are less readily available, but Germany has implemented various self-exclusion measures for gambling, including federal and state-level initiatives.

Comparatively, both GAMSTOP and BetStop face challenges with enforcement and coverage, but GAMSTOP benefits from being mandatory for UK-licensed operators, which may enhance its effectiveness. Both programs struggle with non-licensed sites and full enforcement across all gambling forms. They have significant user engagement, reflecting their national mandated status and public awareness campaigns.

In Australia, players are now required to receive a monthly overview of their deposits and winnings. If a player is registered in the BetStop register, they will not be able to create an account for online or offline gambling. BetStop is free and designed to be simple to use, with a sworn statement from a doctor or psychologist required for registration.

GAMSTOP allows players to exclude themselves from all gambling websites and apps with a UK license. Providers are required to mention BetStop on their website and in their advertising, and must commit to not sending marketing materials to persons on the BetStop register.

While the effectiveness of these measures remains to be seen, continuous improvement and expansion of these systems are necessary to effectively protect vulnerable individuals. There have been rumors of an advertising ban for online gambling in Australia, but no confirmation has been made yet. Providers are now required to immediately confirm a player's identity when registering at an online casino.

In conclusion, while these programs aim to reduce gambling harm, they face similar challenges in terms of enforcement, coverage, and user evasion strategies. It is essential for governments and regulators to address these issues to ensure the protection of those most at risk.

  1. The trend in casino-and-gambling regulation, as shown by programs like BetStop in Germany, GAMSTOP in the UK, and OASIS in Germany, involves the implementation of online self-exclusion registers to combat problem gambling.
  2. Policy-and-legislation regarding gambling-trends in various countries, such as the mandatory participation of UK-licensed operators in GAMSTOP and the free, doctor- or psychologist-verified registration process for BetStop in Germany, play a significant role in these systems' effectiveness.
  3. While discussions about general-news topics, like an advertising ban for online gambling in Australia, continue, it is crucial for continuous improvement and expansion of these self-exclusion measures to effectively shield vulnerable individuals from gambling harm.

Read also: