Skip to content

Home's Truth Surfaces

Previously praised for criticizing excessive SEC involvement, Commissioner Hester Pierce now mirrors the same "approach us" stance she previously ridiculed, this time concerning tokenized shares. However, it seems that the perceived transparency of web3 might not be as effective a defense as...

Home Resolution Finds Its Footing
Home Resolution Finds Its Footing

Home's Truth Surfaces

In a surprising turn of events, SEC Commissioner Hester Pierce has extended an olive branch to the crypto industry, inviting prospective product developers to engage in dialogue with the commission and its staff. This shift in approach comes after Pierce's previous criticism of the "Come in, talk to us, and register" mantra, which she mocked as an unworkable joke in her 2024 statement.

The recent invitation is in response to Robinhood's announcement to tokenize a range of US equities and allow trading of those tokens "on the blockchain." Pierce's statement suggests that Robinhood's lawyers might have questions about the SEC's views on specific products, and they may seek clarification on the SEC's stance regarding the "facts and circumstances" of various potential products.

Pierce's recent statement does not provide legal advice but raises potential issues in more complex matters. For instance, she provides examples of how a token could be a "receipt for a security," which is itself a security. This hypothetical conversation in her 2025 statement includes a scenario where the SEC refuses to provide straight answers or legal advice to a project.

The commissioner's change of heart seems to be a reflection of the SEC's aim to engage more openly with crypto industry participants. Pierce acknowledges that the SEC is focused on clarifying rules around decentralized protocols and Layer2 solutions, attempting to differentiate truly decentralized projects from centralized entities requiring traditional regulation.

Interestingly, Pierce's recent statement also addresses non-compliant activity related to issues that she thinks are not complex. However, she clarifies that the SEC, constitutionally, cannot exercise control over life-tenured Federal judges that decide these issues.

It's worth noting that Davis Polk, a prominent US law firm, handled Robinhood's Initial Public Offering (IPO). Given its connections, Davis Polk may have a better chance of securing a meeting with the SEC. The firm also employs numerous former SEC officials, which could prove beneficial in navigating the complex regulatory landscape.

In her statement titled "Enchanting, but Not Magical: A Statement on the Tokenization of Securities," Pierce criticized former SEC Chair Gary Gensler's invitations for projects to "come in, talk to us, and register." However, her recent shift towards dialogue suggests a recognition of the need for engagement and potential regulatory innovation while still balancing investor protection.

Robinhood is regulated in multiple jurisdictions, including the US, the UK, and the EU. As the crypto industry continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how this dialogue between the SEC and industry participants unfolds, potentially leading to more clarity and innovation in the space.

Read also: