Skip to content

Increase in Mandatory Yearly Housing Quotas: Angela Rayner Unveils a Goal Exceeding 370,000 Dwellings

All parties involved should contribute in addressing the "severe housing predicament" that stands as the most critical in recent history, according to the Deputy Prime Minister.

Annual housing targets mandated at over 370,000 units, as per Angela Rayner's announcement
Annual housing targets mandated at over 370,000 units, as per Angela Rayner's announcement

Increase in Mandatory Yearly Housing Quotas: Angela Rayner Unveils a Goal Exceeding 370,000 Dwellings

Labour Unveils Ambitious Housing Plan, Aims for 370,000 New Homes Annually

In a bold move to address the country's housing crisis, the Labour Party has announced plans to build over 370,000 new homes each year, with a focus on increasing housing supply in the north of England and the Midlands.

According to Labour's Shadow Housing Secretary, Ms Rayner, this target is ambitious but necessary, balancing ambition with realism. However, it remains unclear if the government accepts the Liberal Democrats' target for 150,000 new social homes every year.

Ms Rayner's proposals include encouraging the building of homes on brownfield sites and "grey belt" land, a shift from the current focus on greenfield sites. The government has outlined its own "five golden rules" for building on the grey belt, with 50% of new homes being affordable.

Under the new plan, local authorities will be required to plan for homes proportionate to the size of existing communities. This approach aims to ensure that housing developments are tailored to the needs of each community, providing stability for local authorities compared to the Conservative's approach, according to Ms Rayner.

However, if councils fail to meet their housing targets, there is a risk that green belt land could be targeted for housing development. Ms Rayner acknowledges that some areas might appear to get a surprising target, but she suggests that no method is perfect and the old one produced odd outcomes.

In response to criticism, Ms Rayner asserted that the housing crisis requires real change, and that all parties must play their part. She also mentioned an uplift in housing targets where house prices are out of step with local incomes.

One of the most controversial aspects of the Labour's plan is the removal of the word "beautiful" from the National Planning Policy Framework, a claim made by Kemi Badenoch. This move, if implemented, could lead to concerns about the aesthetic impact of new housing developments.

It remains unclear if councils working on new development plans will have to start again using the new terms, or if the government accepts the Liberal Democrats' target for 150,000 new social homes every year. Ms Rayner clarified that the target for London, although lower than the previous nominal target, is still a significant one, with a drop from 100,000 to 80,000 homes.

Labour's plan emphasises close collaboration with councils to decide what kind of homes and where to meet local demand. The party aims to build 1.5 million houses under this plan, a figure that, according to Kemi Badenoch, could result in local councils being forced to "sacrifice their own green spaces".

As the housing crisis continues to be a pressing issue in the UK, the Labour Party's ambitious plans, while controversial, offer a potential solution to address the shortage of homes and provide stability for local authorities.

Read also: