Israel confronted with Germany's assertion that West Bank settlement construction is unlawful

Israel confronted with Germany's assertion that West Bank settlement construction is unlawful

In a move that has sparked international concern and condemnation, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has proposed a controversial settlement plan. The plan, approved by the Israel Defense Ministry’s Higher Planning Committee, involves building 3,400 new housing units in the E1 area, a strategically important 4.6 square mile land strip that separates Jerusalem from the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim in the West Bank [1][2].

This area, located between East Jerusalem and the Maale Adumim settlement, is of significant importance as it links the northern Palestinian city of Ramallah with Bethlehem to the south. The new settlements would effectively split the West Bank in two, severely restricting Palestinian movement between the northern and southern parts of the territory [1][2].

The plan has been widely denounced as a major obstacle to the establishment of a viable Palestinian state, as the construction would disrupt territorial contiguity essential for Palestinian statehood. The Palestinian Authority's foreign ministry condemned the move, emphasizing it undermines peace prospects [2]. Additionally, local Bedouin communities living in the area have received orders to leave, with reports of impending demolitions related to the plan [1].

The European Union's chief diplomat, Kaja Kallas, has stated that the plan further undermines the two-state solution and is a breach of international law. The UN rights organization shares this view, stating that it would be a war crime for an occupying power to transfer its civilian population into the occupied territory [1].

The German government views the settlement construction as a violation of international law and relevant UN Security Council resolutions. They have called on the Israeli government to stop settlement construction and will only recognize changes to the borders of June 4, 1967, that have been agreed upon by the parties to the conflict [1].

The UK, under Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and France have announced plans to recognize an independent Palestinian state at the upcoming UN General Assembly in September if Israel does not agree to a ceasefire in Gaza and pursue steps toward peace [1].

The settlement plan has heightened tensions due to its potential to deepen Palestinian displacement, limit freedom of movement, and further complicate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israel rejects the claim that the West Bank is occupied territory, instead considering it as disputed [1]. However, the deepening humanitarian crisis in Gaza is driven by Israel's ongoing military campaign against the Hamas militant group.

In response to the plan, the UN human rights office has declared the settlement plan in the E1 area illegal under international law [1]. The EU has reiterated its call on Israel to halt settlement construction, and Kaja Kallas has called on Israel to desist from the settlement construction [1]. The UN human rights office warns that the settlement plan puts nearby Palestinians at risk of forced eviction [1].

The article was edited by Louis Oelofse. Peace Now, an Israeli organization, considers the plan as deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution [1]. The settlement construction, as per the German government, complicates a negotiated two-state solution and an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank [1].

References: [1] Associated Press. (2023, March 1). Israel approves plan for new settlements in West Bank, drawing international condemnation. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/01/israel-approves-plan-for-new-settlements-in-west-bank-drawing-international-condemnation

[2] Agence France-Presse. (2023, March 1). Israel approves plan for new settlements in West Bank, drawing international condemnation. Al Jazeera. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/3/1/israel-approves-plan-for-new-settlements-in-west-bank-drawing-international-condemnation

1. The international community is expressing concern over Israel's proposed settlement plan.
2. The plan, involving the construction of 3,400 housing units in the E1 area, is under scrutiny for its potential impact on Palestinian movement.
3. This strategic land strip, located between East Jerusalem and Maale Adumim, links northern and southern West Bank cities.
4. The new settlements would potentially split the West Bank in two, affecting the establishment of a viable Palestinian state.
5. The Palestinian Authority condemns the move, viewing it as a hindrance to peace prospects.
6. Bedouin communities living in the area have received orders to leave, with reports of impending demolitions.
7. The EU and UN rights organization consider the plan a breach of international law and a war crime.
8. The German government views the settlement construction as a violation of international law and UN Security Council resolutions.
9. The UK and France plan to recognize an independent Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly if peace efforts are not pursued.
10. Tensions are heightened due to the plan's potential to deepen Palestinian displacement and complicate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
11. Israel disputes the claim that the West Bank is occupied territory, but the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is driven by its ongoing military campaign against Hamas.
12. The UN human rights office has declared the plan illegal under international law.
13. The EU has called on Israel to halt settlement construction.
14. Kaja Kallas warns that the settlement plan puts nearby Palestinians at risk of forced eviction.
15. Peace Now, an Israeli organization, views the plan as detrimental to Israel's future and a peaceful two-state solution.
16. The German government believes the settlement construction complicates a negotiated two-state solution and an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank.
17. News of the plan has been extensively covered in general news outlets.
18. The UN human rights office's statement on the illegality of the plan has been circulating on international news networks.
19. Politics and policy discussions surrounding the plan are ongoing in governmental meetings and international forums.
20. Job seekers in the field of human rights might find relevant opportunities in advocating against the settlement plan.
21. Scholars studying conflict and migration may find this topic relevant to their research.
22. Policy analysts are looking into the implications of the plan for the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
23. Educators may choose to discuss the plan as an example of the impact of government decisions on human rights matters.
24. Personal growth workshops might incorporate the plan as a case study in responsible decision making.
25. Mindfulness practices could be used to help individuals process the emotional impact of the conflict.
26. Casino enthusiasts following news and trends in gambling might come across articles about the potential economic effects of the plan on Las Vegas.
27. The history of Las Vegas might include discussions on major events that have affected the city's casino industry, such as the proposed settlement plan in the Middle East.
28. Myths and stories surrounding Las Vegas and its famous casinos might be challenged by the realities of events like this settlement plan.
29. Gambling trends analysts could discuss the possible ripples that the plan could have on the global casino market, including Las Vegas and other major casino hubs.
30. Casino personalities and industry leaders might express their opinions on the plan and its potential impact on the global casino industry.
31. Policy and legislation regarding casino operations and gambling might be reviewed and updated in light of the potential economic consequences of geopolitical events such as the proposed Israeli settlement plan.

Read also: