Mike Lindell revels in success as an appeals court annuls a $5 million judgment in the controversy over election data.
In a significant turn of events, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Mike Lindell, the founder of MyPillow, does not have to pay a $5 million award to software engineer Robert Zeidman. The decision was made on Wednesday, and it overturns a previous ruling that was in Zeidman's favour.
The ruling stems from a dispute over election data, specifically related to the "Cyber Symposium" hosted by Lindell in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, in 2021. At the event, Lindell offered $5 million for anyone who could prove that the data released during the symposium was not valid data from the 2020 election.
However, the current status of Lindell's appeal is that the U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled in his favour, overturning the $5 million award he was previously ordered to pay to Zeidman. The appeals court threw out the judge's prior order that required Lindell to pay the award, citing that the arbitration panel overstepped its authority in 2023 when it awarded $5 million to Zeidman.
This decision means Lindell no longer has to pay the award, as confirmed by multiple sources on July 23-24, 2025. It is important to note that this ruling does not affect Lindell's ongoing legal battles, including the Colorado case where he is appealing a $2.3 million award.
In the Colorado case, MyPillow itself was not found liable. Lindell is currently appealing the decision, arguing that he defamed a former employee of a voting equipment company. The jury in the initial trial awarded $2.3 million in damages to the former employee.
Robert Zeidman entered the fray by taking up Lindell's "Prove Mike Wrong Challenge," which concerned data that Lindell claims proves China interfered in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Zeidman submitted a 15-page report claiming the data was not as Lindell claimed, but contest judges did not declare him a winner.
Zeidman filed for arbitration under the contest rules, and a panel of three arbitrators, including one appointed by Lindell, concluded Zeidman had satisfied the rules and awarded him $5 million. However, the appeals court ruling stated that whatever one might think of the logic of the panel's reasoning, it is contrary to Minnesota law.
Zeidman's attorney, Brian Glasser, urged people to read the arbitrators' decision and judge for themselves if the appeals court's decision is more persuasive or rings truer than the arbitrators' unanimous decision. Zeidman, who is known for his work in the field of software and data analysis, maintains that the data presented by Lindell during the Cyber Symposium was not valid.
Mike Lindell, who is one of the country's most prominent propagators of false claims that the 2020 election was a fraud, considers the ruling a big win. He believes it opens the door to getting rid of electronic voting machines and moving towards paper ballots and hand-counting.
It is important to note that the appeals court ruling did not address the validity of Zeidman's claims regarding the data's authenticity. The former attorney general at the time stated that there was no indication of wide-scale fraud in the 2020 election.
This decision is a significant development in the ongoing legal battles surrounding the 2020 election and the claims of fraud made by some individuals, including Mike Lindell. As the legal process continues, it is likely that more rulings will be made, and the truth about the 2020 election will continue to unfold.
- The court ruling in Toronto, similar to the one made by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, might impact future cases related to the media's portrayal of war-and-conflicts and crime-and-justice issues.
- In the world of sports-betting, responsible gambling policies and legislations are under scrutiny due to the expanding gambling trends in Las Vegas and casino-culture.
- Sports news outlets are constantly monitoring casino-and-gambling updates, such as the latest casino-games trends and big-wins at casinos across the globe, including the famous casinos in Las Vegas.
- The Linda vs. Zeidman case serves as a reminder for individuals involved in legal disputes to understand the intricacies of policy-and-legislation regarding arbitration, as the ruling revealed the importance of adhering to the law even in private contests like the "Prove Mike Wrong Challenge."
- Lotteries have long been a staple of general news, with their mix of excitement, winning stories, and social impact generating widespread interest.
- The court ruling could have far-reaching implications in the realm of politics, given the high-profile nature of Mike Lindell and his role in cultural and political debates about election integrity and data authenticity.
- As the world watches the ongoing saga between Mike Lindell and Robert Zeidman, the concept of poker, a game of skill and luck, may serve as a metaphor for the challenges faced in navigating the complex interplay between law, media, war-and-conflicts, and politics.
- Casinos in Toronto, Sioux Falls, and other cities worldwide have implemented various responsible gambling measures to ensure a safe and enjoyable environment for their patrons, amidst growing concerns about the potential negative impacts of casino-games and sports-betting.
- Media outlets are closely following the ongoing legal battles involving Mike Lindell, assessing the broader implications for responsible gambling practices, policy-and-legislation, and the relationship between politicians, the media, and the general public.
- In conclusion, the court ruling serves as a stark reminder of the importance of upholding the law in legal disputes, especially when dealing with high-profile figures, controversial topics, and large sums of money, such as those found in the casino-and-gambling industry and sports-betting markets.
