Prosecutor's chief suggests potential charging for corruption in October

In a series of developments, the ongoing corruption case against Istanbul's Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu has been shrouded in controversy. The case, which began with İmamoğlu's arrest in March, has been a subject of debate due to the delay in finalising the indictment and allegations of political motivation.

Akın Gurlek, Istanbul's chief public prosecutor, has announced a completion timeline of October for the indictment against the Istanbul municipality over graft accusations. However, the delay has garnered criticism from the opposition, with parties like the CHP and the HDP asserting that the lack of evidence is the reason for the delay.

Gurlek has denied these accusations, emphasising that none of the prosecutors involved in the case took judicial recess, suggesting the indictment could be finalised by October. He also stated that only those who voluntarily come forward under the effective remorse provision are not released.

The "effective remorse" provision, allowing for leniency in exchange for cooperation with prosecutors, is a contentious aspect of the probe. The opposition parties have raised concerns about its application in this case, with Party leader Özgür Özel demanding that İmamoğlu's trial be broadcast live on the state broadcaster TRT to demonstrate his innocence. This demand was rejected by Gurlek, who stressed that the law has no provision for broadcasting trials live.

The HDP submitted a motion demanding the same, aiming to demonstrate İmamoğlu's innocence. The CHP has also asserted that the arrests, particularly those targeting İmamoğlu, are politically motivated.

A notable incident occurred on Sept 1, when two men on motorcycles were taken into custody after approaching Gurlek's residence and questioning the police officers guarding his home. The men departed the scene but were shortly apprehended after officers alerted authorities.

The case has also brought attention to the issue of live broadcasting trials. While Gurlek maintains that proper changes from the parliament are required for live broadcasts of trials, the opposition parties believe that such transparency is crucial for public trust in the judicial process.

As the October deadline approaches, the case against İmamoğlu and the Istanbul municipality continues to unfold, with the controversy surrounding the delay in finalising the indictment and allegations of political motivation adding to the intrigue.