Trump asserts that his victory in appointing Supreme Court justices bolsters a debt of gratitude from Obama, stating "He owes me big."

In a landmark ruling on July 1, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that presidents are entitled to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for their "core" constitutional acts while in office. This decision is expected to serve as a binding precedent for future presidents of both parties, making it harder to hold a president criminally liable for actions deemed official.

The ruling, which pertains to criminal charges against former President Trump related to his actions during and following the 2020 presidential election, emphasises that the President is not above the law. However, it states that Congress may not criminalize the President's conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that this immunity is essential for the executive branch's independence. He explained that the President's ability to carry out the duties of the office without fear of criminal prosecution is crucial for the smooth functioning of government.

The ruling makes it clear that this immunity applies equally to all occupants of the Oval Office, regardless of politics, policy, or party. While President Trump signaled that the ruling protects former President Obama, it's important to note that there is no current investigation that has been announced by the Department of Justice into Obama or his administration over actions during the 2016 election.

Similarly, there is no credible or verified information that any authority announced in 2024 an investigation against Obama and his administration for violations during the 2016 presidential election. The ruling does not provide immunity for actions deemed unofficial or criminal outside the scope of the President's constitutional duties.

This decision is likely to have far-reaching implications for the accountability of future U.S. presidents. While the ruling underscores the importance of the executive branch's independence, it also raises questions about the limits of presidential accountability and the role of Congress in holding the President accountable for his actions.