Voters are our ultimate rescue in this situation

Voters are our ultimate rescue in this situation

In a dramatic turn of events, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People's Party (TPP) in Taiwan have passed a controversial bill, the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social, and National Security Resilience. This act proposes unconstitutional universal cash handouts, sparking debates about its legality, economic implications, and impacts on the political landscape.

The Swiss Lesson

The controversy mirrors a similar initiative, the 2016 referendum in Switzerland on introducing a Universal Basic Income (UBI). Switzerland's voters chose to reject the welfare proposal due to concerns over the collective fiscal burden. The rejection of UBI in Switzerland shows that despite strong advocacy, there may be significant public skepticism due to concerns about the program's effectiveness and cost.

Legal and Constitutional Framework

If universal cash handouts are deemed unconstitutional, it could lead to legal challenges and potential invalidation of such programs. This could undermine public trust in the government's ability to implement novel social policies. The act involves budget allocations, yet it was proposed by the Legislative Yuan, not the Executive Yuan, and imposes a deadline for implementation. This move has been criticised as an encroachment on the Executive Yuan's authority to propose budgets and execute them.

Article 70 of the Constitution states that the Legislative Yuan "shall not make proposals for an increase in the expenditures in the budgetary bill presented by the Executive Yuan." The KMT argues that the special act is a statutory bill, not subject to the legal constraints mentioned in Article 70. However, this argument has been met with controversy, with many questioning the constitutionality of the act.

Public Perception and Support

In Taiwan, public perception might be influenced by factors such as economic stability, trust in government, and the perceived need for social safety nets. UBI programs could face similar skepticism unless they are well-documented and supported by robust economic analysis.

Economic Implications

Implementing universal cash handouts would require significant funding. This could necessitate new taxes or redistribution of existing funds, potentially affecting Taiwan's tax policies and public spending priorities. The economic impact, as in Switzerland, might include discussions on how UBI affects workforce participation and productivity.

Political Polarization

The debate over UBI could exacerbate existing political divisions in Taiwan. Different parties might have varying views on the necessity and viability of such programs, leading to increased political polarization. As a response, policymakers might explore alternative social welfare programs that are more constitutionally sound and less controversial, potentially leading to a broader range of social safety net options.

In conclusion, unconstitutional universal cash handouts in Taiwan would likely face significant legal, economic, and public perception challenges, similar to those seen in Switzerland's UBI referendum. Addressing these challenges would require careful policy design and public engagement. The Executive Yuan had to hold off on allocating a budget to avoid giving the KMT an opportunity to use it as propaganda to fuel anti-recall sentiment. The implications for Taiwan's political landscape are yet to be fully understood, but one thing is clear: the road ahead is fraught with controversy and debate.

1. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People's Party (TPP) have stirred up a controversy with their recent bill for universal cash handouts.
2. The bill, the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social, and National Security Resilience, has led to debates about its legality and economic implications.
3. This act resembles a 2016 Swiss referendum on introducing a Universal Basic Income (UBI).
4. Switzerland's voters rejected the welfare proposal due to concerns about the program's effectiveness and cost.
5. If Taiwan's universal cash handouts are deemed unconstitutional, it could lead to legal challenges and potential invalidation of such programs.
6. The act involves budget allocations, yet it was proposed by the Legislative Yuan, not the Executive Yuan, and imposes a deadline for implementation.
7. This move has been criticized as an encroachment on the Executive Yuan's authority to propose budgets and execute them.
8. Article 70 of the Constitution states that the Legislative Yuan "shall not make proposals for an increase in the expenditures in the budgetary bill presented by the Executive Yuan."
9. The KMT argues that the special act is a statutory bill, not subject to the legal constraints mentioned in Article 70.
10. However, this argument has been met with controversy, with many questioning the constitutionality of the act.
11. Public perception in Taiwan might be influenced by factors such as economic stability, trust in government, and the perceived need for social safety nets.
12. UBI programs could face similar skepticism unless they are well-documented and supported by robust economic analysis.
13. Implementing universal cash handouts would require significant funding, potentially necessitating new taxes or redistribution of existing funds.
14. The economic impact, as in Switzerland, might include discussions on how UBI affects workforce participation and productivity.
15. The debate over UBI could exacerbate existing political divisions in Taiwan, potentially leading to increased political polarization.
16. Policymakers might explore alternative social welfare programs that are more constitutionally sound and less controversial.
17. Addressing these challenges would require careful policy design and public engagement.
18. The road ahead is fraught with controversy and debate, with the implications for Taiwan's political landscape yet to be fully understood.
19. The Executive Yuan had to hold off on allocating a budget to avoid giving the KMT an opportunity to use it as propaganda to fuel anti-recall sentiment.
20. The Swiss referendum on UBI serves as a cautionary tale about the challenges of implementing such programs.
21. The debate over UBI in Taiwan echoes broader discussions about welfare and social safety nets around the world.
22. Casino-and-gambling, including casino-games such as blackjack, slots, and roulette, have a long history in Las Vegas, dating back to its founding.
23. Vegas-history is often intertwined with myths and legends, such as the tale of how the city was originally called Mexican Forks.
24. Gambling-trends have evolved over the years, with newer games like poker and sports-betting gaining popularity.
25. Casino-culture has had an impact on pop culture, evident in films like The Hangover and Ocean's Eleven.
26. Sports, including football, champions-league, NBA, NFL, soccer, WNBA, baseball, hockey, golf, tennis, and various European leagues, have all been subjects of sports-betting.
27. Conversely, discussions about responsible-gambling have gained attention due to concerns about the risks associated with casino-and-gambling, car-accidents, fires, and crime-and-justice.

Read also: